Law of Cohesion

2 min read

Law of Cohesion

“The Law of Cohesion for Multiple Recursions of the Viable System: The System One variety accessible to System Three of Recursion x = the variety disposed by the sum of the metasystems of Recursion y” (HOE 1979: 355). Appendix adds “for every recursive pair” (HOE 1979: 567). “Perhaps the most significant” of the book’s discoveries (HOE 1979: 275).

What Beer says

Organization creates “fragmentation which only its capacity to provide cohesion can offset” (HOE 1979: 335). Hierarchy glues by dependency; recursive logic needs a process: PLANNING (HOE 1979: 336). No treatise, Beer says, “contends that it is actually the ‘glue’ of organizational cohesion” (HOE 1979: 336). Planning: “a continuous, managerial, process of decision”; “plans should always abort before their time is due” (HOE 1979: 276). Autonomy to System One, command “minimally used, consistently with maintaining cohesion of the viable system: it must not fly apart” (HOE 1979: 351). Takeover promises of untouched autonomy are “poppycock”; interconnectivity “inevitably takes up variety from the new subsidiary.” Autonomy “does not mean zero interference” (TBYT 2009, “The Viable System Model”: 149).

Where it sits in the model

First Axiom: cohesion inside one viable system. Law: cohesion between recursions (HOE 1979: 355). Algedonics are “its mechanism” (HOE 1979: 407). Pathological autopoiesis is effort beyond what the law needs (Pathologies of viable systems; HOE 1979: 411–412).

Textual notes

Body (HOE 1979: 355) vs Glossary: adds “for every recursive pair” (HOE 1979: 567) (Pure VSM — Appendix).

Punch and Judy

Punch and Judy (Mathis and Heath, v0.5.0 draft) argues that the autonomy–cohesion balance this law depends on is claimed determinate and assigned to the resource bargain but never computed or measured, and that the channels between recursion levels were specified as mechanisms rather than institutions with owners the regulated could name (Chs 4, 13). The manuscript sets beside that gap Herbst’s minimum critical specification and Endenburg’s sociocratic double link, which it says supply at precisely that point a design rule and a working mechanism the model does not.

Open points

Whether manuscript §13.4 stays; print ellipsis at HOE 1979: 351 is four dots. Draft not canon (Pure VSM — Overview).

Part II — The Viable System Model · Viable System Model · Principles and axioms of organization · The Heart of Enterprise · Stafford Beer · Punch and Judy — Overview